Talk:Syntagmatic analysis

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force.

Philosophy: Language Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of language

Untitled

Hi I did my thesis in structural linguistics. I'll expand this a bit but I will probably need help with terminonology and the specific conceptual aspects. ELABORATE IN WIDE SENSE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.59.3.92 (talk) 16:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yoda

I trimmed this out because it's an incomplete idea.

Turning to the grammatically correct sentence, it prevents the text from reading like it was written by Yoda.

Yoda's sentences are no harder to read that the ethnographic shamanism of Carlos Castaneda; Yodaese syntax is nonstandard, but not difficult. — MaxEnt 20:09, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]