Talk:Synod of Ráth Breasail
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]i presume the source is unclear as to what provinces the dioceses were in? Morwen - Talk 21:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sadly, yes, simply mentioning that Armagh was the northern and Cashel the southern.Lozleader 09:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- I was in the local library this morning, and found four books on Irish history of the period that mentioned the synod, and they all contained the same information: 2 provinces, 12 dioceses each, Waterford and Dublin not included because they were Viking dioceses, already subject to Rome via Canterbury. But no definition of the 2 provinces. It's obviously obscure, and an arrangement that only lasted about 40 years. A possible source is The Church in medieval Ireland by John Watt (1972) is quoted as a reference in two places, but it's not in my library. Lozleader 13:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- Start-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- Start-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- Start-Class Ireland articles
- Mid-importance Ireland articles
- Start-Class Ireland articles of Mid-importance
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles