This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Sylvia Kantaris is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
I was reviewing this AfC draft and returned to find it already accepted, so I'll share my comments here:
The claim "In 1971 she returned to the UK, and settled in Helston, Cornwall, in 1974, where she undertook tutoring in Twentieth Century Poetry for the Open University while writing and publishing her major works of poetry." is sourced to the subject's own website, which is not a reliable source and should be avoided for biographies. Is there a better source available for this sentence? Bradv13:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not saying the information can't be used, but the subject's own webpage is certainly not a reliable source per WP:RSSELF. A source that is independent of the topic is preferable. Bradv14:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's for subjects talking about other things such as the earth being flat, crop circles being formed by aliens etc. Obviously common sense would tell you that Kantaris is a reliable subject expert on herself! An independent source is preferable, but the article's only at start-class at the moment, so there's plenty of improvement that can be done, including this. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)14:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see that anywhere in policy. Here's what WP:RSSELF says:
Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book and claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published media are largely not acceptable. Self-published books and newsletters, personal pages on social networking sites, tweets, and posts on Internet forums are all examples of self-published media.
If we accepted all drafts at AfC based on what people said about themselves, the queue would be empty. Again, this is not a contentious statement so it's probably fine (and notability is established by other sources), but a reliable source would be preferable. Bradv14:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There's a search function on that site which doesn't appear to work. If the site isn't public, the reference is not of much use (unless the problem is only temporary). Bradv14:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]