Talk:Swoon hypothesis

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Jesus work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Swoon hypothesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110129181729/http://www.blueletterbible.org:80/commentaries/comm_view.cfm?AuthorID=3&contentID=3129&commInfo=8&topic=Crucifixion to http://www.blueletterbible.org/commentaries/comm_view.cfm?AuthorID=3&contentID=3129&commInfo=8&topic=Crucifixion

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

why is other perspective of an indian hindu guru put under "islamic perspective"?

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Swoon_hypothesis#Other_perspective

this probably should not be here and if anyone insists on keeping this, please remove it from the heading of islamic perspective. Mhveinvp (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was moved to its own Rajneesh movement section for now, —Paleo Neonate – 04:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think Rajneesh’s opinion needs to be here, since he doesn’t bring up any arguments or advance the theory in any way beyond supporting it. Maybe it can be mentioned in the article, but I certainly don’t think it needs its own section. Bagabondo (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]