Talk:Switzerland and weapons of mass destruction
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Switzerland and weapons of mass destruction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Switzerland and weapons of mass destruction has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 2, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Switzerland and weapons of mass destruction appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ahem...
[edit]The neutrality of Switzerland is disputed. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. |
KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, that made my day. :) --1990'sguy (talk) 03:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Quick, put it at the top of the talk page! Bluesphere 07:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- You can't put anything on top of wikiproject or GA boxes. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Quick, put it at the top of the talk page! Bluesphere 07:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
No, it wasn't enriched
[edit]I'm amazed that since 2016 this article had said that the Swiss bought ten tons of ENRICHED uranium from the Belgian Congo. I can only attribute this to editors either not knowing much about the technical side of this, or just glossing over that line. The Belgian Congo did not and could not enrich uranium. They produced and sold exclusively unenriched (natural) uranium. --NuclearSecrets (talk) 17:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)