Jump to content

Talk:Swiss Family Robinson (1960 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Location

[edit]

The movie states the family going to Kaiser-Wilhelmsland, which wasn't founded till 1884, so how could the family be fleeing the Napoleanoic wars? Is this a mistake of Disney or of the person writing the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.26.75.179 (talk) 04:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In an early scene, when the family has gotten ashore and is camped out on the beach, the Mother says to the Father that they did the right thing leaving Europe, due to "Napoleon Bonaparte grabbing up more and more" and her fear that her sons would have ended up fighting in a war. The film never mentions Kaiser-Wilhelmsland...the dialog only says that they are going to a new colony in New Guinea. It never says the name of the colony. --IllaZilla (talk) 07:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Style of writing

[edit]

The style of writing is rather informal and the language could be further improved. Unfortunately, as I have not seen the show I can't edit several parts like "The tiger tried to get its claws on the dogs, but they wouldn't let him touch them, and then BAM!", also is the ending really "Roberta spotted the pirates, alerts the others who soon head for the fortress..." I think that there is no need to write in such detail and unnecessary information could be cut out, and the main plot should take priority. --M3rrick 02:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Urban legend?

[edit]

The original cast called for a fourth son who was rather ponchier and round, named Patrick Malloy Robinson. He was later cut from the cast when he was found sleeping with one of the other male cast members. The Patrick Malloy Robinson incident was covered up by the crew and never made the tabloids.

What evidence is there for this?--Jess Gordon 20:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted this item. There has been some past juvenile vandalism of this article from anonymous IPs, and this is clearly another such incident. StanislavJ 02:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Swiss family robinson322.jpg

[edit]

Image:Swiss family robinson322.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Swiss Family Robinson (1960 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

rentals in 1969?

[edit]

sorry what types of movie rentals in 1969? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.41.68 (talk) 01:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]