Jump to content

Talk:Sweyn II of Denmark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coinage

[edit]
Coin of Sven Estridson. British Museum.
Sven Estridson coin pendant, found in Mildenhall, Suffolk. British Museum.

A coin and coin pendant of Sven Estridson. Feel free to insert them in the article. PHG (talk) 04:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where is Olav den Hellige and Harald Haarfagre?

[edit]

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Harald_I_of_Norway

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Olaf_II_of_Norway

Source needed

[edit]

They reached land and stopped at the house of a peasant to ask for something to eat. "What was the terrible rumbling in the night?" she asked. "Didn't you know the two kings were fighting all night?" asked one of Sweyn's men. "Who won, then?" the woman asked. "Norwegians," came the reply. "It's a shame on us, for a king we already have. He limps and is timid." "No," King Sweyn explained, "Timid the king of the Danes is assuredly not,"[clarification needed]defended another of the king's men, "but luck isn't with him and he lacks a victory." The housecarl brought the men water and a towel to wash themselves. As the king was drying his hands, the woman tore the cloth from him, "You should be ashamed of yourself for using the whole towel for yourself," she scolded. "The day will come when I will have your permission to use the whole cloth," was the king's comment. Her husband gave the king a horse and Sweyn continued on his way to Zealand.

The above passage is similar to Snorri Sturluson account in King Harald's Saga but there are a few factual mistakes. Could the source be given? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.93.254.128 (talk) 23:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Children

[edit]

Can someone clean up the list of children and add scholary sources? Different sources vary on the list of his children. There is three Sweyn Svendsen listed. In medieval lands there is only two listed. Was Sweyn the Crusader actually an legitimate son of Sweyn II instead? If so why didn't he succeed his father in 1074? And can someone add the info on the Sweyn that was the father of Henrik Skadelår, the father of Magnus II of Sweden?--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 04:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that your question is a good one, Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy, but the answer is fairly simple. The conditions in the Scandinavian realms were still such, that legitimacy was less important than support from the clans and ability in combat. That also gives a hint on why it's such a mess with the lists of children./Johan M. Olofsson (talk) 13:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vicky the Viking

[edit]

Wasn't he model for "Sven the Terrible" from Vicky the Viking? 93.211.26.36 (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had to look up Vicky the Viking, but it seems very doubtful. Sven is often used as a generic name for Nordic people, and the characteristics described in the article on the tv-series doesn't resemble this person at all. --Saddhiyama (talk) 14:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sweyn II of Denmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 December 2024

[edit]

– Google search would seem to indicate that these proposed names are the common names. "Eric" (with a C) seems to be the most common spelling for Eric I and II, and "Erik" is the most common spelling for Eric V and VI. Векочел (talk) 20:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:45, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Norse history and culture, WikiProject Middle Ages, WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, and WikiProject Denmark have been notified of this discussion. Векочел (talk) 20:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Google Scholar results:
We stopped translating personal names around the year 1900. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:39, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those are modern examples, do you have any examples from the 1000s AD? 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 03:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is Saint Erik. Векочел (talk) 17:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The fact that Eric with a C is the traditional English spelling is totally irrelevant. What matters is how these monarchs are referred to in reliable English-language sources, giving slightly more weight to recent sources. There is a general trend away from anglicising proper names, and in some cases this can even change the common name of people or places that were historically anglicised. Rosbif73 (talk) 09:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I am not getting similar results from Google Scholar for Eric II of Valdemar IV. One takeaway, however, is that there is no consistency and there may not even be a clear title "preferred" by RS in these cases. Srnec (talk) 21:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Erik Mendev and Erik Klipping. Here's the Ngram for Eric VI. Some of the results are of the form "Erik VI Menved", which cannot be used when deciding between "Erik IV" and "Erik Menved", so I have subtracted them from the results. For Eric V, a simple Ngram is not possible because "Eric V" can also mean people with the middle initial "V". Prefixing the search terms with King and assuming the frequencies stay the same, here are the results: Ngram. "Erik Glipping", "Erik Klipping" and "Erik V" are the three most common names (in this order). I prefer the second most common name, because the margin is small and the quality of the sources seems higher for that name (e.g. Knut Helle's and Sverre Bagge's books). The sources seem to prefer 'Eric' the closer we are to the Viking age, and 'Erik' for the later kings. IMO, Eric of Pomerania (Ngram) and Eric XIV (Ngram) should also be renamed to achieve some consistency. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 12:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "Saint Canute" Per Google Ngram, although "Saint Canute" is more popular than "Canute IV of Denmark", "Canute IV" is still more popular than both. Not to mention, there is another Canute recognised as a saint in Roman Catholicism.
𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 03:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If one takes the variant spelling St Canute into account, then St+Saint Canute is the most common form: Ngram. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 11:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in mind however the other "Saint Canute", which can skew the results. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 22:12, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sweyn_II_of_Denmark&oldid=1265149749"