Jump to content

Talk:Sweden–Turkey relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I just now saw the article and was thinking how does this reflect on modern relations, if anyhow... --... there's more than what can be linked. 13:17, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sweden–Turkey relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sweden–Turkey relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Sweden–Turkey relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article biased on the side of Sweden

[edit]

Biased template added because the article is full of Swedish leaning rhetoric. 46.31.118.91 (talk) 06:06, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please identify the specific text at issue. Note that the sources would need to be inaccurately summarized; if they are accurately summarized, you would need to take that up with the sources, not us. Being biased does not by itself preclude the use of a source on Wikipedia, as all people and sources have biases. Sources are presented to readers so they can evaluate them and judge any bias for themselves in determining what to believe. Wikipedia does not claim to be without bias or to be the truth, only that the information presented can be verified, see WP:TRUTH. 331dot (talk) 10:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true. Wikipedia requires that info be supported with reliable sources, see WP:RS. It also claims to be balanced and free of POVs, which it cannot guarantee all the time of course. 46.31.118.91 (talk) 08:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the general disclaimer. Wikipedia strives for a neutral point of view, which is different from a lack of bias- which is impossible. Wikipedia does not claim to balance all points of view if reliable sources do not, see WP:FALSEBALANCE. Again, if sources in this article are not being accurately summarized, please detail the specific errors. If reliable sources are biased towards Sweden, then Wikipedia is, too. The sources are presented so readers can figure that out for themselves, if true. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your informed explanation and bringing further clarification to the matter. Kind regards, 46.31.118.91 (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information needs update

[edit]

The article still has Sweden as not a full member of NATO