Talk:Swanley

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Kent C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Civil parish

The original article didn't make clear the fact that the TOWN of Swanley is actually a civil parish and includes other settlements, including Swanley Village , which deserves its own article. It is two separate places. Peter Shearan 07:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising copy

This entire piece reads like an estate agents blurb. There are no references whatsoever does anyone fancy doing a major clean up? --ClemRutter (talk) 21:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History of Swanley

This Wiki is inaccurate. I can't be arsed to change all of the mistakes in the text, but will point out the following:

Swanley is not mentioned in Domesday Book.

There is no clear evidence that the derivation of the placename Swanley is 'a clearing for pigs'. I am sure this fiction was invented by a history teacher at Swanley School sometime in the late 1960s as a backhanded insult towards the kids he or she was expected to teach. If Swanley was a Saxon name chances are it would have received mention in Domesday. It didn't. The name is just as likely to be derived from the personal name Sven, Svein or something similar.

The Wiki fails to mention that the original settlement of the town of Swanley (as opposed to modern-day Swanley Village) was based around Birchwood which does get mention in later medieval and early modern documents.

Swanley was never a major flower growing or orchard area (at least not more so than any other part of North Kent). It did however house a horticultural college (now moved to Wye near Ashford) which helped develop some modern flower and fruit varieties.

The A20 Swanley bypass was built in the mid 1960s not the 1970s.

The shopping centre that predated ASDA was built in the 1970s not the 1960s.

Swanley in Greater London

@217.205.204.10: The article has been amended to claim parts of Swanley are in Greater London. The parish of Swanley does not cross the Greater London boundary. So what exactly is claimed to be both part of Swanley and within Greater London? MRSC (talk) 09:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC) The rural area near Hockenden Lane, and by the Swanley By Pass. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.205.204.10 (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bus Info

Why remove the bus route info? Every other page has it. Very annoying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.65.158.64 (talk) 19:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Swanley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100703065757/http://www.swanleytowncouncil.gov.uk:80/infopage.asp?infoid=337 to http://www.swanleytowncouncil.gov.uk/infopage.asp?infoid=337

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Swanley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6Dut4dJrf?url=http://www.swanleytowncouncil.gov.uk/infopage.asp?infoid=334 to http://www.swanleytowncouncil.gov.uk/infopage.asp?infoid=334

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]