Talk:Svetolik Dragačevac/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 21:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Svetolik Dragačevac (Serbian Cyrillic: Светолик Драгачевац; 15 April 1883 – 9 July 1942) Old or New Style of calendar? Also, add the other calendar too.
was a retired Serbian law enforcement official who sent Link Serbian.
born in the town of Požega, in central Serbia, on 15 April 1883 Pipe Serbia to the Kingdom of Serbia and which calendar? Also, add the other calendar too.
Following Macedonia's annexation by Serbia as a result Unlink Serbia.
the city's evacuation in late 1915 as a consequence of Austria-Hungary, Germany and Bulgaria's Link or pipe Austria-Hungary, Germany and Bulgaria to the German Empire and the Kingdom of Bulgaria.
harsh winter ordeal across the mountains of Albania on the way Pipe Albania to the Principality of Albania.
A Serbian-language documentary chronicling Dragačevac's life Link the Serbian language.
requesting that Dragačevac's wife Jelena be informed of his demise No née for his wife?
You mentioned the Belgrade Special Police in the lead but the body doesn't mention it
No edit war.

Infobox

"15 April 1883" Was this the Old or New Style calendar? Also, add the other calendar too.

Images

Hopefully someone makes the image better one day. But to me, it looks good as long it is fair use. But just curious do you know when the picture was taken?
No ORs.

Sources

Maybe split the section in two and add the books in the "Bibliography" section.
Ćirković's source and page number should be separated. Because other books' page numbers are separated too and standardise them.
Erdelja's book should be separated with its page number too. Also the ISBN doesn't work to me.
U.S. Army's source should be the same as the above.

That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CPA-5. Thanks for taking this review. Unfortunately, none of the available sources provide old style dates or his wife's maiden name. I'm not sure I understand what sort of changes you would like me to make to the citation format. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We should know whether the source is written in Old or New Styles is there not another source who can confirm these? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 12:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, Dragačevac is an under-studied figure. The only academic sources that give insight into his life are Ćirković's biographical dictionary and the Mauthausen website, both of which are referenced in the article. As I mentioned, they merely give his birth date as 15 April 1882. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Amanuensis Balkanicus: Okay that's fine I guess. Could you please address the rest of my comments? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CPA-5. The Mauthausen site says he was interrogated by the Gestapo but that the recommendation that he be sent to a concentration camp came from the SD and SiPo. The same source refers to the Belgrade chapter of the SiPo, not the Belgrade Special Police, which was something different entirely. When I was writing the article I must have read Belgrade Security Police as Belgrade Special Police. Good catch! None of the sources mention his wife's maiden name. They also don't mention when the picture was taken, but based on his apparent age in the photo and the style, I'm guessing the 1920s. As for the referencing style, I prefer to use <ref> </ref> when writing a short article with a small number of sources and reserve the sfn styling for longer articles with dozens of reference points. I hope my answers were helpful. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:08, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CPA-5 and Amanuensis Balkanicus: Just a reminder ping that this is still open. AIRcorn (talk) 07:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CPA-5, could you please let me know if my responses were satisfactory so we could finish up this review? Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. Pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 10:00, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]