Jump to content

Talk:Sussex Police

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PCC candidates

[edit]

There is an article on the BBC mentioning a debate between the PCC candidates if anyone's interested: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-20250400 Kookiethebird (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Today

[edit]

This may seem pedantic but I believe that it is important to challenge what has become an increasingly persistent misuse of language in respect of British Police forces. This article is following the modern trend and so it seems appropriate to discuss it here.

What I am talking about is, I believe, an acceptance of phraseology that has arisen from a lazy definition of non-warranted and support staff within the various forces. They are very often described as civilian staff. The use of the term civilian in reference to these posts is not in question, for they are most certainly that, but the use is in the context that the warranted staff are by inference something different. In the normal usage of the English language in the context of governmental authorities they are either civilian or military (in which the term naval may be substituted dependent upon which arm of the armed forces is in question).

The article describes the senior management structure and the relevant paragraph concludes: -"Also forming part of the command team are the Director of Human Resources and the Director of Finance although both of these roles are filled by civilian members of staff".

It is easy to understand how the canteen discussions by warranted officers may well use a form of short-hand (if speech can be described thus?) that differentiates between those sworn into the office of Constable and those who are not, but it is not a viable definition in any other circumstances. In a civil emergency in the UK, by law, the Police are the service which is given the role of lead for the very reason that they are a civil force. Unlike the Gendarmerie in France and other places which is a branch of the military, the British Police forces are definitely civilian, and therefore even the most senior officer is a civilian and not to be distinguished in that regard from the Directors of Human Resources or of Finance.

I contend that notwithstanding the frequent description of civilians within the various British Police services as something not really part of the service, a use frequently made by politicans, pundits and journalists, these are clearly not well informed sources and their poor usage ought not to influence Wikipedia.WelbeckLincs (talk) 01:43, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sussex Police. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sussex Police. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sussex Police. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sussex_Police&oldid=1198915202"