Talk:Susan Collins (artist)

This page was proposed for deletion by This is also Sven Manguard (talk · contribs) on 6 November 2012.
It was contested by Salix alba (talk · contribs) on 2012-11-14T01:07Z

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists

Own words

Please rewrite the article in your own words. Thank you. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 15:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inhabited content

I found the following listing at the British Library http://catalog.bl.uk/ , and think it might be worth mentioning in the article.

Collins, Susan Alexis. Inhabited content : an exploration into the role of the viewer through the realisation of ’In conversation’ and other works. University of Reading, 2001.

When working on the biography of a British academic, it is often a good idea to use http://catalog.bl.uk/ to see what the academic has written. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 15:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

copyright

This user finds copyright paranoia disruptive. Artlondon 15:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

notability

Collins organised the Tate's first net art -- http://www.tate.org.uk/netart/tateinspace/

recent article http://www.ciac.ca/magazine/archives/no_25/entrevue.htm

As the article stands, I'm personally quite happy that notability has been asserted. I'd love to see more refs though. I've tagged as many facts with the ciac ref as I can, but there's still one sentence that remains unreffed. Can anyone help with the ref? Chovain 20:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues

I noticed that the entire article is a copy of Susan Collins "Info" page at http://www.susan-collins.net/ (or http://ucl.ac.uk/slade/sac/info leads to the same page). Nominated for deleted becasue, looking at the above comments, it hasn't been improved in 5 years. Though Collins is not completely un-notable, it may not be worth the effort to try saving, unfortunately. Sionk (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the edit history we find the copyvio originated with this edit [1]. I've reverted the article to the version it was before the copyvio. She seems to have some claim to notability so its not an automatic prod. There may be a case for deleting some of the revisions which are copyvio's.--Salix (talk): 00:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]