Talk:Supranet

Copyright violation

Hi, someone asked whether the text of this article may violate copyright. I wrote the original entry and I can attest it is NOT a mere copy and paste, and therefore there is no copyright violation risk whatsoever. I do not know hot to remove the relevant template!!!!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by KHLehmann (talk • contribs) 11:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikify

Hi, what does it mean to "wikify" this article (other than formatting a first sentence)?! Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by KHLehmann (talk • contribs) 15:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. In this case, "wikify" meant replacing the bullets in the unordered list with '*'s, and replacing the smart quotes with unsmart ones. Basically, stripping out all the fancy stuff a word processor adds in. HairyWombat 04:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPIP

This is rather transparently an attempt by a company to promote an un-notable buzzwords they coined as well as their own brand. This is embarrassing that this article remains up. Searching this buzzword doesn't even result in mention of the company that created this article, rather the first results are for an internet service provider in Wisconsin. (Also, check all the citations, 'Garter Research Report', clearly falls under WP:OR 76.24.176.5 (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deletion

This page has been recently proposed for deletion (22 November 2024) by themoonisacheese (talk · contribs) with the comment:
Fails to meet notability.

See previous topic by 76.24.176.5. Despite the article being significantly copyedited for the better, nothing can save the fact that this isn't a term people use outside Gartner, Inc. This page would be much better suited as an article on the previously mentionned Wisconsin-based ISP. Themoonisacheese (talk) 09:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]