Talk:Supply Corps

I have a problem with "Members of the Supply Corps have statistically been involved in more inter-military criminal acts than other branches of a military service".

1. I would be interested in seeing those statistics. 2. I think you mean that members have been have been involved in more acts of misappropriation of government funds and property due, though I don't know how you could approve it. 3. The statement is a little inflamatory and probably represents some prejudice that you have against the Supply Corps. If you can prove your statement beyound a single anecdote, I think we might also want to add:

• Surface Warfare Officers have statistically caused more ship groundings than other branches.
• Aviators have statistically caused more airplane crashes than other branches
• Admin Officers has statistically caused more typos on official correspondence than other branches

-unsigned anon user 5Aug05

I think you took that article way too personally. I moved the paragraph over to the Navy Supply Corps article since there have been studies on it, Ive seen several, resulting from the Kittty Hawk incident. It does seem to be mainly a U.S. thing, however, so it actually does belong better on the U.S. Navy Supply Corps article. As far as people having a prejudice towards the supply corps, I hope you're not talking about me since I served 4 years in a supply/logisitcs unit working under several supply corps officers (see bio on user page) -Husnock 14:48, 5 August 2005 (UTC)