Talk:Superimposed schedules of reinforcement

Merge

Merge - topic should be simplified and merged with the Reinforcement#Schedules of reinforcement section of Reinforcement. No need to have it as an orphan. --WLU 16:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article with concurrent schedules of reinforcemeent and the material from previously merged schedules of reinforcement can now be gathered to be a separate article on schedules of reinforcement. The main reason is that the reinforcement article would become lengthy and less comprehensible. Kpmiyapuram 16:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I find his name incredibly unpronouncable, I tend to agree with User:Kpmiyapuram--I've posted a comment on the Reinforcement talk regarding this..it seems that the Schedules subheading is getting larger than the rest of the article...we could start an article that is the book -- and discuss the schedules within it possibly...I'm open to suggestions. BTW -- the merge templates both redirect to the Talk:reinforcement rather than these pages here. Josh.Pritchard.DBA (talk) 10:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]