Talk:Superdiamagnetism

merge/redirect to meissner effect

Hi people; Shouldn't this be merged or a redirect to the meissner effect? Information in both articles is largely redundant. The meissner effect is more complete. Just a thought. Cheers everyone, Pedro Venda. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pjvenda (talk • contribs) 13:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Is "superdiamagnets" and "superconductors" different names for the exact same thing, or is there a physical difference? The article should make it clear whether superdiamagnetism is only a "feature" of superconductivity or completely defines superconductivity. And does a classical perfect diamagnet exhibit the Miessner effect (which classical perfect conductivity fails to explain)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.198.241 (talk) 05:12, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, this does look similar to Meissner, should be merged unless it indicates clearly if it refers to something else MaoGo (talk) 09:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]