Talk:Sunni view of Ali

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sunni Islam task force.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shi'a view of Ali --Striver 12:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ali RA fourth caliph.jpg

Image:Ali RA fourth caliph.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained revert

Hello Onel5969. You made this revert. Can I ask you why? Ghazaalch (talk) 17:11, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ghazaalch, sure. It's commentary, and not appropriate for an encyclopedic entry. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand yet Onel5969. Can you explain a little more? Ghazaalch (talk) 18:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ghazaalch, commentary is just that, commenting on the subject, rather than simply adding objective information with appropriate sourcing. When you insert comments like "However, this was not the case from the beginning." and "Among Sunnis, Ali has the same position as the other three caliphs..." that's inappropriate. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:47, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sa.vakilian. Could you explain Onel5969's position to me? Ghazaalch (talk) 00:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me. I rarely check here. It is better to ask a Sunni editor to help you with the issue.--Seyyed(t-c) 13:38, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]