Talk:Sunland Group
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This page reads like a public relations article! It should be rewritten to take a more neutral perspective.
No mention of Sunland's involvement in the failed Dubai project and the resulting court cases.
Was this page written by Sunland? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.150.55.175 (talk) 23:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Dubai court case
[edit]An IP editor keeps removing the section on the Dubai court case without explanation. The case has been mentioned in multiple articles, was costly to the company and led to them cease investments in that region. It is therefore worthy of inclusion. - Shiftchange (talk) 00:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
RfC: Edit warring
[edit]Edit history for article shows that one line has been repeatedly removed by IP user 103.95.1.154 and truequeenslander. Mediation would be appreciated to resolve edits regularly being made and reverted. JagarTharnofTamriel (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hello JagarTharnofTamriel. I would suggest that you remove the RfC template you have used, as this is not the sort of dispute that process is generally used for. It would be better to do one of two things or, preferably, both:
- Start a conversation here, laying out why the section belongs in the article, showing the sources and reasons, and inviting Truequeenslander, Drwiki9, and anyone else who has blanked it (including the IP) to show why they think it doesn't
- If blanking continues, go to the edit warring notice board to fill out a report, as that can be an effective means of resolution (so long as you aren't edit warring yourself ~ i hope you aren't).
- Just my two cents worth; hope it helps. Happy days ~ LindsayHello 14:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Summoned by bot. Agree with Lindsay here, not appropriate for RfC but I will watchlist the page and if problem persists, then take to WP:ANEW. Meatsgains(talk) 16:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Regarding allegation which has been removed
[edit]Truequeenslander, Drwiki9, 103.95.1.154 Allegation is reported in an article published by the Courier-Mail which the article cites and adheres to what is contained in the original article. As such there does not seem to be a basis for its removal. JagarTharnofTamriel (talk) 15:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Stub-Class Brisbane articles
- Low-importance Brisbane articles
- WikiProject Brisbane articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Stub-Class Civil engineering articles
- Low-importance Civil engineering articles
- WikiProject Civil engineering articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles