Talk:Summer Magic (EP)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Summer Magic (EP) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Special" Mini Album
[edit]I don't see what's informative about calling this a "special" album. There is no information about what qualifies it as particularly "special" other than a mention that it was marketed as such, with no citation. Is it supposed to be special because it was released in summer? It just sounds like an advertisement for the album, and not something that's notable enough about it to count it separately to other Red Velvet EPs.
At the moment there are sections in other Red Velvet articles like "RBB is the upcoming fifth extended play (eighth overall)" which doesn't even make sense. Either RBB is their fifth EP or it's their eighth, just putting "overall" after the second number without another qualifier on the first number doesn't change that.
Someone please clean up these parts, either by differentiating them in a meaningful way with citations, or by just grouping all the EPs together.122.56.203.109 (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC).
- I don't agree with it either, but someone keeps changing them. So I wanted to just put it as something like "eighth (marketed as their fifth)" or just put the marketing bit in the Background. Korean news sites don't consider them as regular EPs because of how the companies market them, which is why most articles are written that way. Lonedirewolf 12:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- If every Korean site calls it that then fair enough. Would be great if they could get citations though, and either way to change the wording because like I said the current wording makes no sense.115.189.92.27 (talk) 12:17, 23 November 2018 (UTC)