Talk:Summer Enrichment Program (University of Virginia)
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by Transity (talk · contribs) on 23 July 2009 with the comment: Non-notable, local, K-5 school program, with almost no content in the article (only a link to the official site, and a link to the official logo). It was contested by Patar Knight (talk · contribs) on 2009-07-25 with the comment: De-prod. It is available to students up to Grade 11. Has actual content. Being short is not a reason for deletion. On a personal level, I recall one of my friends attending it (We're both Canadians), so I don't think it's just local. |
still in progress, don't delete
- The page has been proposed for deletion, which means it is "safe" for a week. It won't be deleted before 30 July. As such, if you can expand it before then, and show notability, it will likely be safe. Alternately, it is your right to remove the proposed deletion tag. Simply edit the article, and delete all text above the {{notability|date=July 2009}} tag. Before you expand the article or remove the tag, you might want to consider if the subject truly meets the guidelines for notability. You can read about those guidelines at the general notability guidelines and the guidelines for notability for an organization (I believe they are the applicable guidelines, given what I know about this topic). --Transity (talk • contribs) 19:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- I see that someone removed the proposed deletion tag. As I said above, that's fine, but there still isn't any indication of notability or reliable sources for this article. I did some quick searches, and found very little of note on Google, and only one mention on Google News (that was about the students at the program coming down with the swine flu). If this article is to be kept, it still needs reliable sources (there are none right now), and an indication of notability. --Transity (talk • contribs) 19:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- One other note. I submitted for CSD when the page truly had no content on it. Content was added, and the speedy was (correctly) declined. I then took it to PROD as the article did not assert notability, and did not contain any reliable sources (the only content it had at that time were two links to the program's site, and nothing else). The article is now slightly longer, but the issues of notability and reliable sources remain. I will monitor for expansion, and see what happens. I have no intention of AFDing in the next few days, so there is time to expand. --Transity (talk • contribs) 19:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|