Talk:Suffix array

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Suggestion: add articles for O(nlogn) and O(n) algorithms.

I searched for both Doubling Algorithm(which runs in O(nlogn) time) and Skew Algorithm(a.k.a. DC3, Difference Cover modulo 3), and there's no result. As an important data structure in string processing I think these two algorithms should be covered. I'm no expert so anyone willing to help? Actually I am named BNJ representing Benjamin Jones. But that name is occupied. (talk) 06:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added a light description of the underlying concepts of doubling and recursion. StephanErb (talk) 15:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of citations

We could use citations in a few places. We have references at the bottom, but no notes in the text. I'll fix when I have time. 70.68.169.53 (talk) 04:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was me. Blowfish (talk) 04:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consider it done. StephanErb (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Algorithm

else if W > suffixAt(pos[m-1]) then ans = m seems to be wrong. it think it is else if W > suffixAt(pos[n-1]) then ans = n —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.230.235.192 (talk) 14:29, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. And fixed that and also R = m-1, which didn't match the description. Mjordan (talk) 06:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]