Talk:Sudhir Venkatesh
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"trick"
[edit]The disambig page for trick states that the usage here is slang, so I'd change those words to "customers" based on the definition given in the disambig, but what's stopping me is the passage that reads "3% of the tricks were given for free to police officers". Now I'm not so sure if "trick" is correctly defined, since "3% of the customers were given for free to police officers" doesn't seem like the original intent of the author. Could someone who knows a bit more about this revise it? Aar ► 23:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- The trick page doesn't say anything like that, but considering it slang instead of jargon is just a matter of opinion. In any case, trick can refer either to the johns or to the act itself. Obviously the latter is meant here, and there's no problem in its use. -114.91.67.205 (talk) 10:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Authenticity
[edit]Has anyone reviewed or investigated the man's books or claims? The comments section of his posts to the NY Times Freakonomics blog (where he has police speaking to him on record about their penchant for more vigilantism & less law, as well as a party of thugs first sitting around for season 5 of the wire and then discussing Federal Reserve policies) have numerous people calling him out on fabrication or embellishment of his stories, but nothing serious or thorough. The fact that this site and his book apparently use "Black Kings" (not a real gang, although there is a Black King Cobras) where Freakonomics has "Black Disciples" (a real gang, but with a different history than that described) doesn't seem to bode well. -114.91.67.205 (talk) 10:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
There are questions about both the authenticity and his academic as well as financial practices. He underwent an intense year long audit while at Columbia University regarding misallocation of $250k. He went from tenured Columbia University professor to working at Facebook. He gained the trust of gangs, but later worked as as a consultant for the FBI.
I would start here:
https://scatter.wordpress.com/2008/02/01/the-strange-case-of-dr-booty-and-mr-t-bone/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.14.43.230 (talk) 22:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Sudhir Venkatesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110417024413/http://www.berlin-school.com:80/nc/people/profile/of/sudhir_venkatesh/ to http://www.berlin-school.com/nc/people/profile/of/sudhir_venkatesh/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Stub-Class Chicago articles
- Unknown-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles