Talk:Studio One (company)/Archives/2015
Appearance
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Recent edits
I began reviewing the recent edits by @Usterday: and started seeing that almost all of the sources were just blurbs or brief mentions cobbled together to focus excessively on the most promotional aspects of an acceptable article. I did restore the logo change however; it would be nice if we could get the logo image on a transparent background.
Thank you @Grayfell: for reverting, as it was quickly looking like reviewing the edits one-by-one was not a good use of time. CorporateM (Talk) 23:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- @CorporateM: Sorry about that, I didn't didn't see your edit, and since it was a revert I didn't get an edit conflict warning, otherwise I would've discussed on talk. The sources were way, way too flimsy, though. Grayfell (talk) 23:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, will revisit the edits one at a time and try to only use full articles. Didn't see these as passing mentions, but no matter. No point in adding something that isn't agreeable! Usterday (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)