This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
No it isn't. A stable dollar is a dollar stable in value. A strong dollar is a dollar that is (or is perceived to be) expensive compared to other currencies (and taking account of PPP). If it took £100 or €110 to buy $1, the dollar would be said to be strong. If £1 or €0.90 could buy $100, the dollar would be weak. However the US government has never provided a definition of what a "strong" dollar is, it would appear to be the case that by "strong" they mean "not falling in value", but again not much information has ever been published about the strong dollar policy, at least not that I could find. Maybe someone could submit a freedom of information act request? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivanleo (talk • contribs) 22:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
