Talk:String Quintet No. 4 (Mozart)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

External links

@Justlettersandnumbers: removed a number of links from the external links section, as follows:

BBC Discovering Music (browse for .ram file for this work)
Performance of quintet by the Orion Quartet and Ida Kavafian from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in MP3 format
Analysis of the quintet based on the Kübler-Ross model of grief and loss
Analysis of hemiola in the minuet of this work
Michael Lorenz, "An Interpretation Issue in the Slow Movement of Mozart's String Quintet K. 516" (Vienna 2014)

Justletters writes in his edit summary "Wikipedia is not a link farm". How true! Yet I think that five links to analyses of important aspects of the piece and public domain performances is not excessive. How do others feel? If you agree, I would like to restore these links. Regards, --Ravpapa (talk) 07:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ravpapa! Yesterday I removed (4) musictheoryprof.com from this and other articles because it appears to be a blog-type source that someone has been spamming here. My thoughts on the others are: (3) intimatemusic.blogspot.com surely falls into the same category as (4); (1, 2) if you want to listen to this music there are innumerable ways to listen to numberless different performances, so adding just two of them here seems a little pointless; and (5) if this is a reliable source, why not use it as a reference? Im not a fan of external link sections (which tend to act as spam magnets), but won't object if you feel those others should be added back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Justlettersandnumbers, You may be right. Let's hear from some other editors before making a decision. Ravpapa (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]