Talk:String Quartet No. 2 (Borodin)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Differing dates for the composition of String Quartet No. 2 (Borodin)
[edit]Sources give variously 1881, 1885 (both the MusicWeb Classpedia page, and 1885 in music), or even 1881-7 (Oxford Concise Dictionary) for dates of completion for Borodin's 2nd Quartet. I admit in writing the article I went the wrong way about it, depending on an apparent consensus of available articles. Will check the score at the library or the Dover edition published a few years ago (unless someone reading this has a copy, of course.) Schissel : bowl listen July 5, 2005 02:35 (UTC)
Prose
[edit]Schissel, the style of the prose is somewhat idiosyncratic for an encyclopedia. I'm not bothered much by it, but someone willing may want to recast parts of the musical analysis. - Gyan 02:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Too limited information for the third movement
[edit]The analysis of the other movements are great and very helpful. Is it possible that anybody can write about the third movement? Thanks!
Lugiamale (talk) 18:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
The third more popular than the second movement?
[edit]I see… 🤔 GianMarco Tavazzani (talk) 13:37, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Minor composer?
[edit]What characterises a 'minor' composer? Or any 'minor' artist? Fame? Quantity of output? Quality of same? And who makes this evaluation? With what authority? 2403:5807:1A18:0:172:9188:8DB6:EB10 (talk) 20:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Her name was actually...
[edit]... Ekaterina Protopopova 2403:5807:1A18:0:172:9188:8DB6:EB10 (talk) 20:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)