Talk:Street News

A fact from Street News appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,622 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Street News, sold by homeless individuals in New York beginning in 1989, became the prototype for street newspapers worldwide?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/March.

Wikipedia

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Finding sources: books, news archive, web

Thank you

Thanks for helping with this Rjanag. Writing a street paper article is easy and fun when it's enough to create a half-crappy start and wait for you fix it up! --Apoc2400 (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, no problem; you actually had a great start here, and came across some refs that I hadn't seen before (I have since stolen them to use in the Street newspaper article). Thanks for all the work you've done getting rid of these redlinks! rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 21:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions

98.165.73.193, please refrain for a moment from reverting the article, and explain here why the information in the article is incorrect. It is in a published source and I believe it is innocuous; if you are concerned that it gives too much weight to negative things, there is

Harris, Timothy (14 September 1997). "Strength in Unity: Street Newspaper Must Not Be Its Own Enemy". Founding Conference of the North American Street Newspaper Association. Real Change. Archived from the original on 3 November 2005. Retrieved 13 March 2009.

which I believe has some information about Street News's recovery after these things, and could be used to expand the article. Anyway, please explain for us what is wrong with the information so we can start discussing how to fix it; that will be more productive than all of us reverting one another. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 17:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please send your email address to hp111@yahoo.com before putting the text I've been deleting back into the article. I will send you some information which you can decide how to use and whether you still think it appropriate to put in what you've been including. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.73.193 (talk) 17:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an email. --Apoc2400 (talk) 18:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now, wait a second. There's no reason for someone to require off-wiki communication for this. Apoc, I appreciate your getting in touch with this person by e-mail, but it shouldn't be necessary; 98.165.73.193, I would appreciate it if you explain here why the information is wrong. If you are unwilling to explain why the information is wrong, then you can't keep reverting like this. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 18:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The explanation would take up several pages and some of the information sent to apoc just now, you might or might not decide is relevant. Also there's a very good reason why the information was sent privately. I'll be happy to copy you with what I sent to apoc. Regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.73.193 (talk) 18:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Street News. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070911030448/http://www.rrj.ca:80/issue/2002/summer/373/ to http://www.rrj.ca/issue/2002/summer/373/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]