Talk:Stranded (Haiti Mon Amour)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Rihanna Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rihanna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rihanna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RihannaWikipedia:WikiProject RihannaTemplate:WikiProject RihannaRihanna articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Haiti Low‑importance

	Haiti portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Haiti, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Haiti-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HaitiWikipedia:WikiProject HaitiTemplate:WikiProject HaitiHaiti articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Stranded (Haiti Mon Amour) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 February 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Swizz Beatz and Bono began writing "Stranded (Haiti Mon Amour)", a charity single for Haiti earthquake relief, over the telephone?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/February.

Wikipedia

Headline text

it meaans no strand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.12.241.158 (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charts section format

It's come to my attention that, instead of trying to discuss their problem with it (or providing any reason at all for it), a user is continually reverting the format edits to the Chart performance section which has split the one long table into two smaller ones. Blind reversions without reason or explanation are not the way to build Wikipedia articles. I've pointed out multiple times in my edit summaries that this format increases readability and makes the page seem less listy. What's more, if the article should ever go to GAN or FAC this split format will need to be implemented at that time if it is kept to a single long list now. Instead of an edit war, discussing the issue here seems more prudent. As it stands, the lack of a reason provided for the blind reverts makes it seem that a reason for them cannot be provided. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 17:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually why have you spilt them in the first place, on all other hcarts it is in a full chart list what's the point i'm sure other people would agree with me, it just looks like there are 2 different charts! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iluvrihanna24 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have split them for all the reasons I outlined above. It is clear that it is the same chart by the heading, which reads "Chart (2010)". On what "all other charts"? Those on articles that have not been peer reviewed or further? Look at FA examples of song articles, all of which have it split into two: Baby Boy (song), Cool (Gwen Stefani song), Déjà Vu (Beyoncé Knowles song), the list goes on and on. It is the proper format when a chart gets overly long, as is the case here. Thirteen listings is too long for a single column. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 17:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't worth an edit war over. There are GA articles with the charts list in one column, e.g. All Through the Night (Cyndi Lauper song), Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song), Beat It, Bohemian Rhapsody, just to pick a few from the top of the list. If there's a notion that beyond a certain number the charts table gets split into two columns, that guideline should be added to WP:CHARTS and/or WP:MUSTARD#Record charts. Then it will be clear to everyone and there won't be edit battles like this. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is a fake cover, tooken from Rated R promo pics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.44.85.68 (talk) 02:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cover

This song does have a cover. Please chek it out on this link and add it to the page. [[1]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.176.32.172 (talk) 14:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Wasted Time R (talk) 03:07, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

To expand the article:

[2]
[3]

Statυs (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stranded (Haiti Mon Amour). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100330065721/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com:80/world/europe/Archbishop-of-Port-au-Prince-dies-in-Haiti-earthquake/articleshow/5442266.cms to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/Archbishop-of-Port-au-Prince-dies-in-Haiti-earthquake/articleshow/5442266.cms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]