Talk:Stormfront

Stormfront.org

Who is the clown that labelled Stormfront as White "Supremacist"?

It has been decided it is a White Nationalist board. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.136.135 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 17 November 2005

Decided by whom? -Willmcw 20:48, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No one is to decide, here at wikiepdia we keep to the facts. Please read the rules to whoever added these strongly incorrect terms. In the meanwhile, I corrected it to white nationalist and white pride website. Wikipedia:About 85.82.195.131 00:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2009

The only point of a WP:disambiguation page is to direct readers to the correct article, not to explain a topic on its own. There is only one Internet forum called Stormfront.org, so we don't have to try to characterize it here in any greater detail. It has been difficulyt to establish any lasting consensus on how to characterize Stormfront.org, particularly "white nationalist" versus "white supremacist". We don't need either term on this page so let's leave that fight to the article itself. Will Beback talk 06:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm new here Necrodamn (talk) 10:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indirection

See the second part of this edit, changing the link for here to Storm Front back to a direct link. Who agrees with me that this was correct. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:17, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do. Going via a pointless redirect to the Storm Front disambig seems pointless. Verbal chat 16:55, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Stormfront.org's definition

I don't really see why it is necessary to add "first major 'hate' website" or "neo-nazi" to the official redirect page. Labeling it as merely 'white nationalist' - which is essentially what the site officially claims to be - would be the most ambiguous option, and it would avoid the controversy that terms like that would create. Simple is better, yes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.100.161.211 (talk) 18:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]