This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Lihaas (talk·contribs) has been paid by Stor-age on behalf of off freelancer.com. Their editing has included contributions to this article.
Corporate Social Responsibility activities section
I am always a bit suspicious of Corporate Social Responsibility sections in company article pages. Comes uncomfortably close to advertising to me. It is most probably okay but I would like to get the opinion of other editors on this. I do however want to thank the original author of this article for starting it and for openly stating their conflict of interest on the subject.--Discott (talk) 23:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest removing the Corporate Social Responsibility activities section as it is not the sort of thing that should exist on a Wikipedia page, especially for a company article. The rest of the article seems fine to me.--Discott (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
