Talk:Stop Line 3 protests
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Stop Line 3 protests appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
( )
[[File:|140px|Protesters handcuffed together ]]
- ... that protesters against the Line 3 oil pipeline handcuffed themselves together (pictured) at an Enbridge pump station? Source: "Elizabeth Claggett-Borne, 55, of Cambridge, Massachusetts, sat in a beach chair perched in front of a boat blocking the entrance to the work site. She was equipped with a homemade device made of rebar, PVC pipe and handcuffs, in order to make it more difficult for authorities to remove her from the site."
- Reviewed: Lee Tze Chung
Created by Gobonobo (talk). Self-nominated at 01:45, 19 June 2021 (UTC).
- New article, substantial in size. It's a controversial subject but the article appears to be written neutrally. Sources are throughout, including citing the hook fact, which is interesting enough. Image inline demonstrates the hook well. Earwig is happy, says "violation unlikely". Waiting on QPQ. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Gobonobo a QPQ is still required for this nomination, please provide one as soon as you can. 18 days is a long time to not provide a QPQ. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:05, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, the nominator has added a QPQ above; you can continue the review when you're ready to. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:52, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- I forgot to watchlist this nom. QPQ provided, checkmark given. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:19, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
I'm surprised to see this article is rated B class across a number of projects, as the overall tone from the outset gives off a pretty strong impression of violating NPOV (mostly through use of terminology and choice of emphasis). It could benefit from a style/tone rewrite, without altering the content per se. 108.175.233.87 (talk) 01:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- "Indigenous women and two-spirit people have led the resistance to the construction of the pipeline, which began following the project's approval in November 2020." That is the way progressive activists talk (the usage of the word resistance; a heightened focus on intersecting "marginalized" identities), not an encyclopedia. Also, the category "Environmental justice", among many other examples. People are entitled to their views, but it is a complete violation of NPOV to talk in the way activists and Twitter users talk. 2600:1700:FB20:2EB0:8D6B:744E:111A:278C (talk) 21:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Climate change articles
- Mid-importance Climate change articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles
- B-Class energy articles
- Low-importance energy articles
- B-Class Environment articles
- Low-importance Environment articles
- B-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Mid-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- B-Class Minnesota articles
- Mid-importance Minnesota articles
- B-Class sociology articles
- Unknown-importance sociology articles
- B-Class social movements task force articles
- Social movements task force articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles