Talk:Stony Stratford

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Ride a Cock Horse to Banbury Cross

an anonymous editor writes: The Cock hotel is also the subject of claims that it is the source of the phrase Ride a Cock horse to Banbury cross from the nursery rhyme of the same name. "Cock Horses" were hired from the Cock Hotel and could be ridden to the nearby town of Banbury to a similar hotel there situated near the site of the town's famous cross. However a "cock horse" was common parlance for a white stallion and seems possible but unlikely to be true. (Moved from main article as it too speculative).

Eccles.

VoB doesn't support the information about the split between Calverton and Wolverton ecclesiastically: dating a Stony Stratford eccles parish to 1767 (which is probably when the civil parish split into 2). Will check Youngs. Morwen - Talk 14:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Domesday has Stony S. divided down the middle by Watling Street. My info was from a local historian's guided walk. It was he who reported both churches being originally Chapels of Ease, built during the coaching era So it dates back a great deal longer than 1767. Wolverton and District Archeological Society I think he said. I'll try to find out more. --Concrete Cowboy 14:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see that Domesday entry: it rarely had that level of detail - and anyway parishes weren't used as administrative units then - the manor and ville system was still around, and it wasn't for a few centuries that parishes started to acquire boundaries and civil functions. Note also that a local historian's guided walks aren't verifiable sources. (Morwen)

True. I meant Manors, which each would have had its own priests. --Concrete Cowboy 23:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If we look at another source, it has there be two parishes, St Giles (West Side) and St Mary (East Side) in 1862. Morwen - Talk 14:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is excellent stuff. The only thing it needs is clarity over Ecclesiastic Parish v Civil Parish (or were they the same thing?) --Concrete Cowboy 23:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stony Stratford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090608003948/http://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/parishes/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=17026 to http://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/parishes/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=17026

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History of "Queen Anne House"

I deleted material that speculated on the origins of the house. Since the text ended by admitting that there is no objective evidence to support this speculation, it falls foul of Wikipedia policy WP:No original research. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]