Jump to content

Talk:Stonewall F.C.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Football club

[edit]

Per deletion proposal by Johan Elisson, this group "does not fullfill notability criteria for English football teams (playing at level 1-10)", so it should not be put in Category:Football Club. See http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Stonewall_F.C.&oldid=128228497. I'm adding an editor comment to the page itself. --SueHay 20:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is clearly notable on the grounds of being the country's first specifically gay team, regardless of its position in the league system. We should be careful to avoid rigid adherence to the notability guidelines in obviously exceptional cases. Beorhtwulf (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reception etc

[edit]

There must be press articles and such about how they've been received as the first gay team, how the team's formation came about, etc. I think this should definitely be included in the article. Did they meet with homophobia in their early days? Do they have disproportionate support for a team at their level due to their special status, or what? Have any straight people wanted to play for them? Any information would be appreciated in the article. Beorhtwulf (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Stonewall F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Stonewall F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]