Costa Rica Low‑importance

	Costa Rica portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Costa Rica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Costa Rica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Costa RicaWikipedia:WikiProject Costa RicaTemplate:WikiProject Costa RicaCosta Rica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Paranormal Mid‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

These spheres are the topic of a Discovery HD show.

Stone Spheres of Costa Rica Unrelated to Concretions and Megaspherulites

I removed the reference to Concretions, Martian spherules, Moeraki Boulders, and Moqui marbles because the artificial nature of the Stone spheres of Costa Rica is well known as documented in their Wikipedia page, the publications mentioned in its text, and the web pages in its external links section. Being man-made, they are completely unrelated in origin to stone spheres of natural origin, such as, (1.) concretions, i,e, either Martian spherules, Moeraki Boulders, or Moqui marbles and (2.) megaspherulites, i.e. the stone balls of Cerro Piedras Bola of Jalisco, Mexico. The stone spheres of Costa Rica are related to man-made stone balls such as lapidary spheres, stone round shot (cannonballs), and the Carved Stone Balls of Scotland and have nothing to do with spherical and semi-spherical objects of natural origin. Thus, the links to concretions, Moeraki Boulders, and Moqui Marbles lack any relevance to a discussion of the stone spheres of Costa Rica and only confuse the difference between natural and artificial stone spheres / stone balls in people's mind.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul H. (talk • contribs) May 20, 2007 11:59 (UTC)

So... What are they for?

Seems like the article could use a section exploring some of the theories about WHY these people expended what must have been considerable labor in the stone age to produce all these spheres. Was there some practical use for them? Were they art? Did they have religious and/or astronomical significance? Was life so easy for these people that they just had a lot of time on their hands and nothing better to do with it?

Right now, the article is the equivalent of an article on the Egyptian pyramids which discusses their shape, size, and composition -- and makes no mention of the fact that they were intended as tombs for the Pharaohs.

Why "Paranormal"?=

Why does this project fall under the auspices of "WikiProject Paranormal"? There doesn't seem to be anything "paranormal" about these very real stone spheres. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.174.105 (talk) 21:53, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stone spheres of Costa Rica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.ku.edu/~hoopes/balls/errors.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stone spheres of Costa Rica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329102018/http://www.mysteryspheres.com/history.htm to http://www.mysteryspheres.com/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Las Bolas? Really?

I was talking to some Tico guys today after a kayak trip, and I mentioned the spherical stones of Palmar Sur. I said they were known as Las Bolas by the locals. The guys could NOT believe I had said that because "bolas" are a slang word for testicles, and no one, they told me, would use it in casual conversation. Are we sure that Las Bolas is correct?

Chuck — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuckhawley (talk • contribs) 23:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am Costa Rican, informally we used the term "Bolas de Piedra" or stone balls. Just "bolas" when you are joking. I just edited the article to fix it. Cheers--Mariordo (talk) 22:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]