Talk:Stolen Valor Act of 2005
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years |
A fact from Stolen Valor Act of 2005 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 December 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Putting back oppositions and legal challenges
[edit]The reason the act was ruled unconstitutional because it faced oppositions and that was found in one of the edits like this one https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Stolen_Valor_Act_of_2005&oldid=473961968. So I think we need to reinstated it because it will make more sense. Song4Life (talk) 22:27, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles