Talk:Stoke-by-Nayland
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge Discussion
[edit]I'll start the discussion since the nominator didn't bother!
- Oppose merge - Seems to be a village in it's own right with it's own church. Jeni (talk) 00:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Miszatomic and Jeni: was merging Withermarsh Green correct? This was opposed around 3 months earlier and didn't have any support. While It isn't and has never been an independent parish it does have its own church and is in the Domesday Book. IMO it does merit a separate article. In addition it isn't mentioned in this article. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Stoke-by-Nayland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130314055453/http://libraries.waimakariri.govt.nz/heritage/local_history/people/charles_torlesse.aspx to http://libraries.waimakariri.govt.nz/heritage/local_history/people/charles_torlesse.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 3 December 2017 (UTC)