Talk:Stockport

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stockport article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

UK geography High‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester Top‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Population

Editors need to back up a claim with sources. 230k plus population is utterly ludicrous. It make it bigger then Bolton which Stockport is not and that's been left unchallenged without a 2021 census source to back it. DragonofBatley (talk) 18:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't Lombe Assassinated 10 years Prior to the Event Mentioned?

Re: "When Lombe tried to renew his patent in 1732, silk spinners from towns..."

I'm confused because John Lombe supposedly died in 1722, assassinated by a woman hired by the Italians who believed he stole the design for their invention, the silk thrower, Can someone please clarify? The subject of the paragraph is John Lombe, and in fact he is the only Lombe mentioned in the article. But could it be a relative? Or a different year? Or,..???? ObadiahKatz (talk) 22:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory Etymology

This article contradicts the Stockport County F.C one, as it claims Stockport originally meant hamlet with a market but that article claims the name of the town is derived from the De Stokeport family. Which one is correct? Overlordnat1 (talk) 11:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both are referenced, but surely the family name "De Stokeport" indicates that they were "from Stokeport" and so the contradiction is just an issue of which came first. Lithopsian (talk) 15:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There are a few things I’m unsure about or that seem a bit dubious that I’ve started a discussion about on Wiktionary’s Etymological Scriptorium. See the following link[1] Overlordnat1 (talk) 11:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

The picture by Jonathan Thatcher. It says 1791 on the bottom of the actual picture. But it says 1784 in the caption? 81.170.47.91 (talk) 13:13, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Click through to the picture data on Wikimedia Commons and you'll see that it is indeed 1784. Good spot though! 10mmsocket (talk) 17:24, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]