Talk:Still Hacking Anyway

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 April 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Parked references

https://tweakers.net/geek/126507/nederlands-hackercamp-sha2017-krijgt-100gbit-s-internetverbinding.html
~~https://tweakers.net/geek/128035/teslas-hacken-en-datenklos-op-hackerkamp-sha2017.html~~

I am setting these links aside, because they still contain information about the event, but the statement these sources were used to support don't support the statement. The statement was supported by user generated comments section of one of those pieces, which doesn't pass our WP:RS policies. Graywalls (talk) 22:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

concerning edit

I originally removed contents from prose that referenced USER GENERATED COMMENTATOR comments from a Tweaker.nl website. The same contents were re-inserted, but without a reliable source that discuss what was added into text. Just because something has been uploaded on YouTube or similar hosting site doesn't mean that should be mentioned especially if that fact is not discussed in a WP:RS. this edit was reverted again for this reason. Graywalls (talk) 04:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]