Talk:Sticky wicket

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sticky wicket article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Article name

I'm a little surprised to see "sticky dog" get "top billing". In England, at least, I think that "sticky wicket" is far more commonly used. JH (talk page) 20:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a fair comment. Happy for the article to be moved over the redirect (leaving a redirect here) if there's consensus. I'll post to WT:CRIC. --Dweller 09:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd never even heard Sticky dog used to refer to a pitch before, so Sticky wicket it is. Andrew nixon 09:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further support for the move comes from the fact that the Frindall reference doesn't use the term "sticky dog". In fact, the article needs a citation for that term. --Dweller 09:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Sticky dog??!" Sticky wicket all the way! –MDCollins (talk) 09:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of interest, the first documented use, and use as a figurative term are documented here. Be useful in the stub. –MDCollins (talk) 09:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice find! --Dweller 09:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A perusal of Google finds sticky dog popular especially in Australia and on the subcontinent. However, this useful source ([1]) I think sets the seal on the proposed name change. I'm going to move it. --Dweller 09:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm familiar with both terms (I'm British) but "sticky wicket" seems to proper term to me, and "sticky dog" seems like slang. "Sticky wicket" has also entered the language as a metaphor for any situation which you are likely to get in trouble whatever you do, which would be worth pointing out in the article. Stephen Turner (Talk) 09:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've played a lot in England and it's always been 'sticky wicket'. As Stephen points out 'sticky wicket' has entered the general language while sticky dog has not. 'Sticky dog' is more australian and should be a redirect. Even The Melbourne Age uses 'sticky wicket' rather than 'sticky dog' in a headline about Japanese rice here[2] Nick mallory 02:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very amusing that so many imagine their personal experience sets the rule. Ironic especially that the English imagine the world to resemble their neighborhood- Not so much so that they assume they could dictate the truth. Cite.Sources.Wankers.: "Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source." Personally, though It Matters Not, I feel that A Wicket is A Wicket - why would you call the Pitch a wicket? Sadsaque (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Origin section

I've amended this. There's no need as I see it to explain what a bowler is with reference to a baseball pitcher. Plus I have changed the section so that it no longer refers to a sticky wicket being one where the ball hits the wicket but the bails don't come off, which isn't correct. Jules (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is incorrect to say sticky wickets are 'far less common'. Almost all organised cricket, well over 99%, is played on uncovered pitches which have the potential to become sticky, in fact as there has been a massive decline in the skills of groundsmanship in the last 10 years I'd go as far as saying sticky wickets are *more* common now. Only professional cricketers (around 0.001% of all league registered cricketers) are guaranteed covered pitches, while at club level covering is sproadic, generally top club leagues in England demand covers but they are unheard of outside the professional game in the subcontinent. 92.16.34.94 (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Useful source

([3]) --Dweller (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

American Lexicon

How did it get into American lexicon? Americans don't play cricket.

Difficult to translate? Poppycock

"The former leader of the Conservatives in the European Parliament, Tom Spencer MEP occasionally used to refer to batting on a sticky wicket to confuse the Parliament's interpreters, it being very difficult to translate into other languages."

Such a statement seems to imply that one is a translator and is reasonably fluent in several EU languages, which I am; and I find it extremely easy (piece of cake) to translate it in French, Italian, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch and Swedish. The real problem is, too many translators are not acquainted with the British way of life—they just rely on academic credentials and degrees in Literature. So when they are faced with a sticky wicket, or a sticky Willie :-)... their mind goes blank 2.39.13.72 (talk) 19:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]