Talk:Sticking coefficient
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
‹See TfM›
|
Sticking coefficients are often mentioned in articles on thin film growth or surface science. The term is not commonly defined within these papers and furthermore, is relatively unknown outside of these fields. Other engineers and scientists may be puzzled by it. I have added as a link in the article on the Langmuir --the rate of monolayer coverage-- which uses it but does not define it.Brettstrawbridge 21:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Brett Strawbridge
- I'd have to agree that this article doesn't fall under CSD A7. Perhaps it would loosely fall under one of the CSDs, though more likely a prod, but only in its original version. thadius856talk|airports|neutrality 21:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I believe now that it should be transferred to Wiktionary, and I have put that template on the article. It clearly qualifies for an entry there, since it has approximately 694,000 items containing it found from a Google search.149.169.42.207 00:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Brett Strawbridge
2007-09-19 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit]This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |