Talk:Steve Lambert

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Untitled

Since there is another Steve Lambert, we will need some form of disambiguation

I think this is fixed. -FDM arover (talk) 20:39, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lambert contributed a story [3] to the Anecdote Archive organized by Joseph del Pesco and, in the summer of 2009, he participated in the College of Tactical Culture with Brooke Singer, Britta Riley, Eve Mosher, and Stephen Duncombe. All the participants gave a lesson where they discussed several questions: How can we measure the impact of our work?, What lessons can we learn from popular culture?, How can we use humor to broach difficult content?, How can we reach new audiences?, How can we use new tools and technologies to organize and connect with audiences?[4] - I feel this isn't important enough to be part of the article. He has given multiple talks and contributed to multiple articles...many of which can be seen on his [page]. It would be a mess to include everything, I think the page should consist of his major projects/contributions. -FDM arover (talk) 20:39, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it would be a mess to include everything. This was part of the main information before some edits were made and I seperated this part to actually explain what he did. I thought it was an interesting point to bring up because it shows the type of questions that he and other artists are asking through their work.Mgrana (talk) 01:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Mgrana[reply]

I definitely see your point in regards to the questions, perhaps we can attempt to answer some of those questions through his works on the page (The Budget Gallery piece, for example, I feel attempts to bring in a crowd that otherwise wouldn't bother to see such things). Or perhaps only leave up the part that he participated in asking such questions, and then proceed to talk about how some of his projects address those questions. -FDM arover (talk)

I like your ideas, but I feel like if we end up doing that other people might see it as being bias if we don't cite it A LOT. (It might look like we are trying to prove something, like in an essay) Plus those questions were based off that project specifically, so we would need to research the type of questions he was trying to answer in all his projects before we start talking how his projects answered certain questions. Mgrana (talk) 05:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Mgrana[reply]