This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess
Seriously, can anyone provide any justification for linking to Chessgames.com here? What does this website provide to the reader, that any other online or offline collection of chessgames would not? I really don't see anything there. There is ZERO profile information. Nothing that acts as a valid reference for this man's academic or professional history. The link clearly fails several EP guidelines. If anyone can actually spell out a valid reason for including it, I'd listen.--Lecale42 (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The external link here does not provide any reliable information on Steve Giddins as a person. It does link to some games, which may be accurate records, and which may have been played by him. It is not a unique resource for (and let's assume that they are accurate here) his games. You can find those in britbase or chessbase. Therefore, you are not justified in linking only to chessgames in that respect. To do so is merely to favour it commercially - is it not?
I can't see then, why anyone would insist that this chessgames link has to be here. It doesn't fit with the wikipedia policy on external links. If somebody can take that policy, provide just a small detailed explanation as to how and why it fits into the policy, I have ears, and they are listening. I am not at all convinced that wikipedia should blanket link to a website just because it might be acceptable to do so in 1 or 2 (or even 25) cases. That doesn't seem unreasonable or confrontational to me. Please, just write here why it should stay in this instance.--Lecale42 (talk) 23:37, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
