Jump to content

Talk:Steve Armstrong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prod tag

[edit]

I removed the prod tag from this article, I intend to source it within the next few days, if I cannot find good sources I will personally put it up for AFD.  MPJ -DK  09:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • And you need to stop misusing the rules and claim you're within your rights - I'm sure you were allowed to Prod however many articles you had on your list, giving you carte blanche to just disregard the "contentious" portions of the rules is highly doubtful. In fact "burden of proof" wise, it's on you to prove that you're "a special case" in regards to overapplying the rules of sources in BLPs.  MPJ -DK  18:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    No, it's not. The burden clearly lies with the person attempting to reinsert challenged material. I've challenged the material, so source it, or it stays out. UnitAnode 18:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Question

[edit]

Was Steve Armstrong was born in 1964 or 1965? I can't tell because in the box on the right it said 1964 but on the article it said 1965. It's probably appropriate to put a source under which birth year is correct. Minimac94 (talk) 18:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consistency is key, I must have mistyped when I redid the info box, fixed with a source to verify which is right.  MPJ -DK  18:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi are you to day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.190.11.140 (talk) 03:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]