Talk:Stereo-Pak
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lack of Sources
[edit]This article has very few sources. I know it is short but it contains lots of facts. Does it deserve a tag?WikiWiznerd (talk) 02:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Section redirect
[edit]Why is it that every time I come to this page it redirects me to the section on the differences between 4-track and 8-track? Try it yourself, click this link.
By the way I don't quite know enough about Wikipedia to fix it unfortunately. Hello, hello. 01:46, 22 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elecbullet (talk • contribs)
Copy/paste
[edit]Parts of this article have been copied verbatim from other sources on the internet. Please remove these sections and replace them with paraphrased content. In particular, I found this link which contains content that is identical to the content in the History section of this article. SnottyWong talk 16:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nope, the site says that it has been copied from Wikipedia. So in that case, it is not a copyright infringement. It says at the bottom of the page "This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Stereo 8".". Minimac (talk) 06:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Splices? No splices?
[edit]According to the present (06 Oct 2012) version of this article the tape is not spliced (with cheesy emphasis) yet, seemingly impossibly given this fact, the tape splices are mentioned in the very next paragraph as subject to breakage. It's either one or the other and I can't seem to dig anything up suggesting one direction or another. Ogre lawless (talk) 02:57, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
The article also insists (with cheesy emphasis) that the tapes are not spliced with conductive foil tape as 8-track cartridges are. This is patently false; I've come across many mid to late-60s 4-tracks that do have foil splices. I assume this is because 4 track tapes can still be run on 8-track players with varying degrees of success, and given that third-party "snap-in" pinch roller adaptors were also available throughout the late 60s and into the mid-70s specifically for that purpose. I'd write this bit into the article, but wonder if it's really worth it since it'll probably just get misconstrued as "original research" and be reverted accordingly. Oh well, I guess I may as well leave that little bit of misinformation in the article as it is; this is Wikipedia, after all. MXocross (talk) 02:08, 15 November 2012 (GMT)
Motorola fallacy
[edit]Motorola did not sell automotive record players. They were a pioneer in automotive radios. The popularity of the Victor Victrola did make "-ola" a common suffix for consumer audio devices, but that wasn't limited to phonographs. RCA (before they merged with Victor) sold a line of home radios called "Radiolas". Commercial automotive record players did not appear until the "Highway Hi-Fi" system marketed by Chrysler in the 1950s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.35.224.63 (talk) 18:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Mess
[edit]This article is kind of a mess... GigglesnortHotel (talk) 21:05, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Stereo-Pak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20040716090337/http://www.8trackheaven.com:80/muntz.html to http://www.8trackheaven.com/muntz.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111102223822/http://vinylfanatics.com:80/analoglovers/page10.html to http://vinylfanatics.com/analoglovers/page10.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Uncited material in need of citations
[edit]I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:CS, WP:NOR, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 17:15, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|