Talk:Stephen II of Hungary/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag: [1], [2], [3], [4]

The following image is tagged as needing a US public domain tag, and lacks author information: [5]

- - - 3family6, thank you for your review. Sorry, I am not an expert in the field of US copyright law and cannot fix the above problem. Neither do I have information on the authorship of the picture. Borsoka (talk) 07:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the information, the illustrations should easily be in US public domain, since they are centuries old. Therefore, I think it would be okay if I went ahead and added the tag. I'll also mark the one picture without author info as "anonymous."--¿3family6 _contribs 12:18, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Overall: Other than these few minor image issues, the article is good to go.--¿3family6 _contribs 00:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Issues resolved, article passed--¿3family6 _contribs 12:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pass/Fail: