This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
An editor removed what appears to be the only article[1] I've seen with significant coverage about Stephen Dooley, because "it's not a reliable source". I'm aware of no restrictions on using the Irish Sun as a source, and there are many articles that currently do so. I know there's some concerns about some papers, however even the worst of them can still be used with caution, if there are no sensational claims. And there appears to be nothing of the kind here - the facts are all verifiable. Before I restore the edit, perhaps someone can explain their concerns? Or at least point to equally (or more) comprehensive in-depth significant coverage; this is more of profile and detail about the player, than the other references, as far as I can see. Nfitz (talk)
It's a tabloid, WP:DAILYMAIL arguably applies. You also can't have checked the article clearly enough as this is in-depth. The article probably now scrapes through GNG even without The Sun, it adds nothing. GiantSnowman07:52, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Somehow, that appears to be the only reference I didn't check; I'm not sure why the article was prodded with that there. I don't see how WP:DAILYMAIL applies, as the closing statement soley addresses the Daily Mail from England in fact explicitly noting that it concerns only the Daily Mail, and doesn't even mention over English tabloids, let alone the Irish Sun. And if this arguably extends to all tabloids, then the Evening Echo is also a tabloid. Though personally I don't see any difference in quality in the article from the Echo or the Sun. Nfitz (talk) 17:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]