Talk:Stephanie Seymour

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stephanie Seymour article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Picture request

She is so beautiful that it's a shame that no picture is included in the article

YEAH!

On another note, can somebody straighten this out? I've heard she entered the Elite contest & lost... Trekphiler 20:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right -- she didn't win. I think Steph ended up being such a successful model that a lot of people just assume she must've won (I could swear I read once that she placed fourth or fifth, but I can't find an online source for that). A little trivia: Cindy Crawford was also in the 1983 contest, and didn't win either! JilliJ (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1968 or 1969?

Did she born in 1968 or 1969? 114.25.248.230 (talk) 11:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

or even 1967. I remember her year of birth being listed as 1967.173.60.152.5 (talk) 18:09, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Usually listed as 1968. Now it is 1969 in the article, but I'm wondering if the source fashionmodeldirectory really is a reliable source? I would say IMDB is more reliable, but haven't been visiting the model site in ages. 85.217.45.181 (talk) 08:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Son sex topic

Do we feel this should be included in the article? Is it not rumor and gossip? --BwB (talk) 14:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed gossip. --BwB (talk) 09:02, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is worth mentioning. It's been covered extensively in the news and there is photographic evidence of them kissing. Examples:

Perhaps a sub-section under personal life titled "beach controversy with son"? Ranze (talk) 20:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Religion?

Judaism? Conversion to judaism from marriage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.92.113.139 (talk) 02:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what a train wreck ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.184.250.10 (talk) 14:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Stephanie Seymour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can a 16 year old living with a 42 year old really be called dating?

The characterization of this relationship seems to endorse one which is, at the very least, potentially illegal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:F90:6950:1CD2:435E:F3ED:32DD (talk) 17:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Midastouch is claiming she married him @ 15? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PT5vctbicd4 61.69.251.145 (talk) 04:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]