Jump to content

Talk:Stephanie McIntosh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Probably"

[edit]

Removed "You Should have Lied" as the next probable single, as of course, we all know, that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.

We all know its not a crystal ball but Steph said its the probable 3rd single on The Steph Show

Right, but she's a pawn, she/her record label hasn't confirmed it.

Actually she was sat next to the head of Universal Music Australia when she said it and he agreed.

That was a show for the cameras. They can't argue infront of cameras.

He could have had the camera turned off and said no or even had it be not included in the show.

Wikipedia uses official, on-camera statements. It doesn't matter even if they did say no after the camera was turned off.

[edit]

Is it just me or are there too many external links? It just looks stupid and all but two are fan sites/forums. Harry** 20:21, 21 September 2006.

Well the three bottom links have been added recently so remove them Harry.

Steph's mum

[edit]

Steph denied claims that her mum is an executive for channel 10.

"Is it true that your mother is an executive for Channel 10? if so, how influential has your mother been in securing you a place in the extremely difficult Australian Industry, especially as it is well known to be very difficult to break through in Australia?

No not true at all!! She's a retired mummy from reading the news (on channel 2!) but couldn't have done any of this without her and my families support."

http://blogs.theage.com.au/entertainment/archives/2006/09/chatterbox_spec.html Harry** 21:22, 26 September 2006.

Year 9 photograph

[edit]

I removed it as it has no relevance and was in the wrong place anyway.

Always use last name

[edit]

Always refer to her as McIntosh throughout the article, not Stephanie or Steph. This is a basic wikipedia rule. Peter2012

Footy Show criticism

[edit]

Please provide a source for this sentence

"Her performance was received poorly by the audience and has lead to a degree of criticism of Steph and her vocal ability."

It will be removed if a source cannot be found.Symposium 13:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are the frequent edits of this page stating there was a problem not enough? To be honest the addition is just an effort to make a polite reference to the problems that seemed to happen with the performance to stave of some of the less pleasant comments about the performance. -- SeK612 08:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The frequent edits prove nothing but the opinion of a few people. Find some documented proof and its stays.Symposium 13:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What would you consider to be documented proof? Suffice to say the majority of comments I have seen on the performance have hinted that she didn't perform well. If it helps here's a snippet from a Herald Sun article which was relating to the possibility that Steph may leave Neighbours in the near future, possibly branching into music full time:
"Her musical hopes suffered a blow after her haphazard performance on the Grand Final edition of The Footy Show last month."
SeK612 13:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would consider documented proof the documented proof needed. Also what YOU have read doesn't count unless you can provide a link to it. To have an opinion based piece of text on a wiki page it must be backed up or its just random wild speculation.Symposium 06:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Also remember that this is an article not a fan dedication. It is equally incorrect to throttle any bit of negativity or critacism. I'm sure you could have located the article yourself but a direct link is http://www.news.com.au/sundayheraldsun/story/0,21985,20623211-5006022,00.html. SeK612 14:00, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link but no thanks for acting like a child. This wasn't personal it was just a request that YOU provide a link.Symposium 06:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Check your own comments on this page before throwing insults around. I agree this was nothing personal and I simply edited the article as there were frequent changes being made to the Stephanie Mcintosh page regarding her performance on the AFL footy show. I guess I get the need for a references (but then a lot of data on the page would need such references if one were to cite sources - such as say the fact that she is dating Nick Riewoldt or the Aria charting).
I pointed out how you were behaving so it wasn't a direct insult. It needed a source because it was speculation and opinion based. Don't take that as a swipe at what you added its just a fact. Now we need proof of the new comment..... Symposium 06:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the Footy Show section as it was mostly unsourced and poorly sourced, per WP:BLP. I suggest that section be rebuilt with proper reliable sourcing. Crum375 02:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you not tidy it up yourself? SeK612 13:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can try to do it later on. The important thing, per WP:BLP, is to immediately remove the unsourced or poorly sourced derogatory material. Then, a better version can be carefully crafted, that strictly conforms to the BLP requirements. Crum375 14:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steph leaving Neighbours

[edit]

I updated last night to say that Steph was leaving Neighbours to focus on her music carear, it has since been deleted. I am changing it back now, so PLEASE DONT CHANGE IT AGAIN! Below is the link from the ssun herald if you dont believe me. I will add the source now as well. http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,,20969984-27258,00.html Trentis 15:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes

[edit]

None of the footnotes work in this page.--Darrelljon 21:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Stephcover1.jpg

[edit]

File:Stephcover1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2nd album

[edit]

sources? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.186.110 (talk) 22:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Tightrope.OGG

[edit]

File:Tightrope.OGG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:SMMistake.OGG

[edit]

File:SMMistake.OGG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 17:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:SDISSF.OGG

[edit]

File:SDISSF.OGG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 21:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Donovan

[edit]

Could someone source the Jason Donovan claim or remove it, it sounds like a lie. Goblinman (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Goblinman[reply]

I removed this as there was no source I could find.Goblinman (talk) 15:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- I've put it back in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Symposium (talk • contribs) 18:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September

[edit]

Can someone please post a reliable source to Steph now being in a band called September please. This is the first i have heard of it. Trentis (talk) 13:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Stephanie McIntosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stephanie McIntosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Simpson

[edit]

It's me Lisa Simpson I am full deaf and cerebral parsley for disabled I asking you had jason donovan still marry wife Angela? ??? Yes or no Please let me know please Lisa Babelisa (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Stephanie McIntosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Stephanie McIntosh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stephanie_McIntosh&oldid=1208921234"