Talk:Steph Cunningham/GA2
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: HorrorFan121 (talk) 04:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. We've met before. ;) I'll be reviewing the article. Just glancing from it everything looks good. I'm going to take a more thorough look at it later tonight. HorrorFan121 (talk) 04:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Everything looks okay pertaining to disambiguation links. [1] The one on there is just linking to a redirect, so that's not a problem.
- No broken links. HorrorFan121 (talk) 04:51, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Fantastic article! I understand that the article underwent a GA review three days ago. However, I also see a lot of work has gone into it in just the past few days alone. Everything looks in check, the prose looks tight. I saw no grammatical/spelling errors while reading through the article. I find the article Good Article worthy, and I'm going to pass it.
✓ Pass