This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark
I'm generally in favor of removing lists that are completely duplicative of categories since they are simpler to manage; however, artist lists for record labels are almost never completely duplicative. That is the case here, and so I have restored the list. Chubbles (talk) 16:38, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cosprings noted in an edit summary that "red links must have proven notabilty to be included in list". At no point has this been true of lists, and I see no reason for it to be applicable here. Certainly, if that were the case, most lists would be unnecessary as duplicative of categories. A comprehensive list of artists is encyclopedic and I maintain that the existence of a category (which is nice to have) is not sufficient to remove the list. After all, the article is short enough as it is...I'm surprised it's never been considered for deletion. Chubbles (talk) 16:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
